Connewarren BESS

BESS · Akaysha Energy Pty Ltd · Storage - Battery

Dispatch stats Financials
Development AEMO: Publicly Announced Other - Other NEM data · 24 hours
—
Registered nameplate capacity — refresh AI for MW/MWh
Est. SRMC
$1.50/MWh
Key information

Capacity not yet researched — use Refresh equipment & project status (AI).

AEMO status Publicly Announced
Project status Development (AI)

No web results were returned; inferred from the project being publicly announced and not evidenced as under construction or operational.

Coordinates —

DUID —
Owner Akaysha Energy Pty Ltd
Commissioned —
Expected closure —
Closure date —
Technology Storage - Battery
Fuel Other - Other
Battery OEM —
Battery platform / chemistry —
Inverter OEM —
Inverter / PCS model —
Stats window
21 Jul 2026 14:55 → 22 Jul 2026 14:55 AEST

Dispatch & revenue

21 Jul 2026 14:55 → 22 Jul 2026 14:55 AEST

No DUID specified. Open this page from the stats list or a generator profile.

Financial overview

2026 real AUD. Monetary values are CPI-adjusted to 2026 real Australian dollars. Greenfield capex uses AEMO benchmarks when plant-specific cost is unknown.
Type
Battery (BESS)
Capacity
—
Revenue (× MLF) (stats)
See dispatch stats link above
Est. SRMC
$1.50/MWh
Capex total (greenfield)
—
Capex refurbishment
—
Capex / MWh storage
$358,607

Shown in table
$358.6k (2026 real AUD)

Reported / source value
$350.0k (2025 nominal)
Adjusted to 2026 real AUD using Australian CPI (All Groups).
Fixed OPEX (annual)
—
Fixed OPEX / MW-yr default
$25,000

Shown in table
$25.0k (2026 real AUD)
Variable OPEX / MWh default
$1.50

Shown in table
$1.50 (2026 real AUD)
Fuel cost / GJ
—
Heat rate GJ/MWh
—

Confidence: medium · Status: ai estimated · Capex basis: default · AI checked 07 Jun 2026

Notes
Akaysha states Connewarren BESS is a proposed 1,000 MW / 4,000 MWh battery near Mortlake, Victoria, but no plant-specific greenfield capex or financing amount was found in the searched official/primary sources. Because no reported project cost was located, capex fields are left null rather than using a benchmark. No operating cost, efficiency, or asset-life assumptions were found from project-specific sources; only the zero-emissions nature of battery storage is populated as a technology default.

Sources